News

Last Updated 17/04/2009

 
Home
Contacting Us
Guidelines
Bulletin Board
Trustees
Staff
Annual Report
Links
FAQ
 
Information for Applicants for April 2009 to March 2014 can now be downloaded - please go to 'Download our Current documents' or follow this link - Information for Applicants

 

Offenders and Society
 
CIFC Corston Independent Funders Coalition - Please follow link for Advertisement
 
Partnerships to Reduce Offending
Tudor/LankellyChase 2008-2010 


The TLC Partnership is to continue until 2010 - Tudor/LankellyChase Guidelines & Application Form Both trusts have pledged a further £600,000 to continue to support voluntary sector agencies in the SW working within the criminal justice arena. Below are the reports of the two Open Space meetings we held in Bristol and Exeter on July 9th and 10th 2008. Their purpose was to discuss and promote the partnerships which may be necessary if the diversity of the sector is to survive.    

Open Space Event:    Vassell Centre Bristol     9th July 2008
Sandy Park Exeter        10th July 2008
 
 
The Economics Case for and Against Prison


The attached report “The Economic Case for and Against Prison” was commissioned from Matrix Knowledge Group by the Monument Trust, the LankellyChase Foundation and the Bromley Trust. 

We asked Matrix to look at the effectiveness of prison as:

  • bare custody

  • prison with additional interventions (e.g. drug treatment, sex offender programmes, behavioural programmes, education etc)

  • community sentences

  • community sentences with interventions

The chosen measure was the impact of these different approaches on re-offending.

The Report compares the cost of the community sentences versus prison sentences.  The savings to the public purse range from £30K to £88K per offender. When costs to victims are taken into account (and this is one of very few reports that look at these costs), the savings range from £61K to £202K per offender.  No alternative intervention/sentence was shown to be less effective than prison.  Even where there is little difference between a prison or a community payback sentence in terms of cutting re-offending the conclusion is that it is still more cost-effective to use a community sentence.
 
Although previous, piecemeal, research has been carried out, the budget for prisons has risen to almost £2 billion without any reliable or consistently readable evidence that it is effective.  The re-offending rate indicates that it is not.  Indeed a school or hospital performing so poorly would be put into special measures, or closed.  The findings of this Report show that a very large proportion of the prison population is undergoing a regime that is less effective at reducing re-offending than comparable community punishment sentences with the right interventions.

No alternative intervention/sentence was shown to be less effective than a bare custodial sentence and it is clear that reducing the number of prisoners held would release a good deal of the £2million prison budget for investment in and development of effective measures within the community.   

The technical appendix which describes the methodology behind the report is available at http://www.matrixknowledge.co.uk/prison-economics/
 

 

 
 
 

HOME | CONTACTING US | GUIDELINES | BULLETIN BOARD | TRUSTEES | STAFF | ANNUAL REPORT | LINKS
The LankellyChase Foundation is a registered company limited by guarantee number 5309739 and registered charity number 1107583